Quote of the Week:

"He is no fool, who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose." (Jim Elliot)



Drop me a line if you want to be notified of new posts to SiTG:


My site was nominated for Best Parenting Blog!
My site was nominated for Hottest Daddy Blogger!




www.flickr.com
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from Woodlief. Make your own badge here.

The Best of Sand:

The Blog
About
Greatest Hits
Comedy
DVD Reviews
Faith and Life
Irritations
Judo Chops
The Literate Life
News by Osmosis
The Problem with Libertarians
Snapshots of Life
The Sermons


Creative Commons License
All work on this site and its subdirectories is licensed under a Creative Commons License.



Search the Site:




Me Out There:

Non-Fiction
Free Christmas
Don't Suffer the Little Children
Boys to Men
A Father's Dream
WORLD webzine posts

Not Non-Fiction
The Grace I Know
Coming Apart
My Christmas Story
Theopneustos



The Craft:

CCM Magazine
Charis Connection
Faith in Fiction
Grassroots Music



Favorite Journals:

Atlantic Monthly
Doorknobs & Bodypaint
Image Journal
Infuze Magazine
Orchid
Missouri Review
New Pantagruel
Relief
Ruminate
Southern Review



Blogs I Dig:




Education & Edification:

Arts & Letters Daily
Bill of Rights Institute
Junk Science
U.S. Constitution



It's good to be open-minded. It's better to be right:

Stand Athwart History
WSJ Opinion



Give:

Home School Legal Defense
Institute for Justice
Local Pregnancy Crisis
Mission Aviation
Prison Ministries
Russian Seminary
Unmet Needs



Chuckles:

Cox & Forkum
Day by Day
Dilbert







Donors Hall of Fame

Alice
Susanna Cornett
Joe Drbohlav
Anthony Farella
Amanda Frazier
Michael Heaney
Don Howard
Mama
Laurence Simon
The Timekeeper
Rob Long
Paul Seyferth



My Amazon.com Wish List

Add to Technorati Favorites






June 30, 2005
Return of the Movie Review

Warning If you've never read The War of the Worlds, by H.G. Wells, or just can't remember how it ends, and you plan to see the movie (my advice: donate the $15 ticket plus $875.43 for concessions to charity and rent it), then you may want to stop reading now. Plus there's a bit of sexual innuendo, which I think stems from the fact that movie critiquing inevitably leads to a discussion of the climax, which inspires 6th-grade thinking on my part (I still giggle when I say "Manassas"), along with the fact that with the July 4th weekend coming I'm looking forward to seeing my incredibly hot wife cavorting in the sunshine. My apologies.


Caught a late-night showing of War of the Worlds, which sure seemed like a good idea until the alarm clock rang this morning. If you know the original story, you understand the struggle Spielberg is up against, which is that it doesn't have a big, climactic, Independence Day ending, yet it's pitched as a come-see-the-awesome-special-effects movie. So it requires some appreciation for elegance, yet it's been constructed to attract teenagers who generally need the plot and scenes to hit them like a bat across the forehead in order to overcome a cultivated attention-deficit disorder and actually "get" the movie.

In general Americans of all ages like our big, climactic, wrap-up-the-loose-ends-get-the-bad-guy-win-the-girl-"you-had-me-at-hello" endings. They're an entitlement, like college educations, or trouble-free erections until you're 90, or nightly news with a weather fetish and no troubling stories about foreign events. So a movie where the indomitable evil beings die because they catch cold is a little off-putting to many, not the least of whom is the writer of this screen adaptation, because it puts more weight on dialogue and subplots. The writer fails to deliver, by the way, perhaps because with Spielberg's name on it, one can reasonably say: "Plots? We don't need no stinking plots!"

If they weren't going to devote energy to an intelligent script (and really, why bother any more, when you can remake Godzilla, miraculously rendering it even more dreadful than the original, and still earn $136 million?), then perhaps they could have dreamt up an edge-of-the-seat ending. Or at least an ending that isn't the cinematic equivalent of coitus-fall-asleepus.

So here's a thought: the invaders die because they all catch cold, right? So why not have the hero realize this fatal vulnerability, sparking a desperate race to destroy the factory where Tylenol manufactures its Cold & Flu medicine before the aliens can get there with a great big straw? Likewise, he'd have to torch the plant where they make those nasal strip thingies, which I never found helpful but which might have saved the aliens.

Basically I'm talking Bridge Over the River Kwai meets E.T. Or Die Hard meets Predator. Something like that.

Plot aside, here's a message to Hollywood: avoid the Sam Malone Moment. Most of my readers know exactly what I'm referring to: those dreadful minutes when Ted Danson marred the otherwise wonderful Saving Private Ryan. Nothing against Mr. Danson, but when you collect a paycheck for eleven years as the main character in one of the most popular sitcoms of all time, you become your character. There we all were, totally absorbed in one of the most gripping portrayals of D-Day ever portrayed, and suddenly a bartender with a bad hairpiece comes strutting across the screen.

Not good.

Likewise in War of the Worlds. Now personally, I think Tim Robbins as a crazed, paranoid survivalist isn't much of a stretch, especially if you've ever seen him holding forth on current events. But it's distracting to have his mug materialize on the screen. I found myself expecting Susan Sarandon to pop out from a closet, wearing a "No More BuSh" t-shirt.

There are other minor irritations: a commercial jet crashes right beside a house where the protagonists are holed up, with nearly all its debris concentrated in a space smaller than a city block, and yet somehow manages to miss their minivan in the driveway, while conveniently leaving an avenue for them to drive through. Likewise, only the hero has figured out the simple trick to get a car started after the aliens immobilize them. Fortunately, everyone else on the eastern seaboard finds their vehicles stalled in a formation that allows the hero to drive for dozens of miles without ever coming to an impasse.

And another thing: why are aliens always naked? And if they get to run around naked, why are they always in such a bad mood? My kids love that. So do I, come to think of it.

So to sum up, go see Cinderella Man instead. And have a safe Fourth of July. God bless America, and good night.

Posted by Woodlief on June 30, 2005 at 08:57 AM


Comments

Tony,

Although I loved reading your review, somehow the summary of the film that you gave came as no surprise. When I add up the following: Summer Block Buster, Tom Cruise, Steven Speilburg = One week at #1 until people catch on that they have been duped. If only we had some one of your writing ability and taste to warn us before we make the mistake that you did last night. Unfortunately for you, that would mean many nights of mind numbing plots. These "plots" also now consist of some sort of political undertones to keep their liberal actors "stars" delidued into thinking that they are working on something important. Of course this is how they rationalization the collection of huge paychecks for packaging rubish. Thanks for the warning! BTY should I pre-order my tickets for STEALTH or should I wait for your review??

Posted by: Jim R at June 30, 2005 9:48 AM

See why we need you?! I can't even use the word "rationalize" correctly in a sentance!
Think about it. We could make it worth your time$$$

Posted by: Jim R at June 30, 2005 9:54 AM

Sentence... I'll give up now and leave the writing to you :-)

Posted by: Too embarrassed at June 30, 2005 9:57 AM

Thanks for the headsup ... I'll go rent the original and have a good "old" time until the end and then I'll have a nap.

Blessings,

Posted by: J. A. Gillmartin at June 30, 2005 4:33 PM

"Now personally, I think Tim Robbins as a crazed, paranoid survivalist isn't much of a stretch,"

This made me laugh out loud, Tony. TOO FUNNY! The same train of thought actually passed through my head last night as I was watching it.

Did the movie make LOTS of stretches? Yes. But it is Science Fiction, right? I mean that's what the word "fiction" is there for I guess. If you want to see a true story, you're right, go see Cinderella Man. Otherwise, put on your rose colored glasses and enjoy the movie for what it is--entertainment--fiction--a break from reality.

Posted by: Danielle at July 2, 2005 1:01 PM

My 12yo son figured it would be something like that! Thanks for the review though. We have been wondering how the original movie is--anyone want to fill us in?

Posted by: Lyn at July 3, 2005 4:10 PM

Ok...not to be a heretic, but I loved War of the Worlds. I have seen it twice, and I actually liked it almost as much the second time as the first. It was such a tense movie that never resorted to the kind of movie gore that so many of its genre fall into.

Posted by: John at July 5, 2005 11:23 AM

Why are naked aliens cranky? Because they've obviously lost the keys to the spaceship so they can go home. It's not like they have pockets.

Posted by: James Wigderson at July 23, 2005 11:31 AM

I really enjoy your writing style...

"And another thing: why are aliens always naked? And if they get to run around naked, why are they always in such a bad mood? My kids love that. So do I, come to think of it."

thats a classic!
yeah..why ARE they always naked and cranky???

Thanks for writing such a great blog!

I love these blogs...I keep finding such great ones.

mmi


Posted by: molli mi at July 27, 2005 7:16 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)