Quote of the Week:

"He is no fool, who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose." (Jim Elliot)



Drop me a line if you want to be notified of new posts to SiTG:


My site was nominated for Best Parenting Blog!
My site was nominated for Hottest Daddy Blogger!




www.flickr.com
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from Woodlief. Make your own badge here.

The Best of Sand:

The Blog
About
Greatest Hits
Comedy
DVD Reviews
Faith and Life
Irritations
Judo Chops
The Literate Life
News by Osmosis
The Problem with Libertarians
Snapshots of Life
The Sermons


Creative Commons License
All work on this site and its subdirectories is licensed under a Creative Commons License.



Search the Site:




Me Out There:

Non-Fiction
Free Christmas
Don't Suffer the Little Children
Boys to Men
A Father's Dream
WORLD webzine posts

Not Non-Fiction
The Grace I Know
Coming Apart
My Christmas Story
Theopneustos



The Craft:

CCM Magazine
Charis Connection
Faith in Fiction
Grassroots Music



Favorite Journals:

Atlantic Monthly
Doorknobs & Bodypaint
Image Journal
Infuze Magazine
Orchid
Missouri Review
New Pantagruel
Relief
Ruminate
Southern Review



Blogs I Dig:




Education & Edification:

Arts & Letters Daily
Bill of Rights Institute
Junk Science
U.S. Constitution



It's good to be open-minded. It's better to be right:

Stand Athwart History
WSJ Opinion



Give:

Home School Legal Defense
Institute for Justice
Local Pregnancy Crisis
Mission Aviation
Prison Ministries
Russian Seminary
Unmet Needs



Chuckles:

Cox & Forkum
Day by Day
Dilbert







Donors Hall of Fame

Alice
Susanna Cornett
Joe Drbohlav
Anthony Farella
Amanda Frazier
Michael Heaney
Don Howard
Mama
Laurence Simon
The Timekeeper
Rob Long
Paul Seyferth



My Amazon.com Wish List

Add to Technorati Favorites






July 19, 2002
Grrl Power

National Public Radio reported this morning on a summer camp for young girls who want to explore their musical talent free from the sexism that permeates the music industry. The camp was started by a thirty year-old college student with music industry experience who wanted to do something for her musically inclined fellow woman. The camp accepts girls ranging in age from 8 to 18, and provides an environment where they can write lyrics and music, perform, and receive instruction on everything from guitar muting techniques (use the palm of your strumming hand) to sexism in the music industry (it's everywhere).

Being neither a woman nor a professional musician, I can't comment with authority on the sexism charge. One might point to the considerable number of women musicians who are doing quite well, but people with gender antennae more finely tuned retort that most top female earners prove a sexist reality, which is that women are pressured to fit the socially acceptable profiles of sweetheart or sexpot. The goal of the music camp is to overcome this reality by removing budding female musicians from the pressures to conform.

Unfortunately, NPR left me with the impression that the camp also frees the girls from the pressure to produce good music. A quote from one of the expert lecturers, a guitarist for a successful chick band whose name escapes me: "It's not that hard. You really only need three chords." Later in the report, one of the campers explains: "Anyone can be a rock star." I think she may be right.

While the reporter interviewed other campers about their experiences, I could hear in the background various camp bands performing. One featured a young woman squealing "Girls rock! Girls rock! Grrrrrllllssss!" Another affected a quasi-Jewel sound, only the guitarist used two chords (one less than the expert's recommendation; an appropriate thumb in the eye of repressive authority), while the singer unleashed her voice on the scale like an untended fire hose on full blast.

I suppose the point of the camp is not to refine talent so much as it is to remove social expectations. Of course it fails even at this; it simply creates a new set of social expectations -- that girls will not feel compelled to sing in a soft voice (too much like Britney Spears, notes one camper), or write lyrics that make sense, or critique one another's work, or choose to learn guitar methods from anyone without a vagina.

I'm all for fighting the pressure the entertainment industry puts on women to behave like whores (though this is substantially a demand-side problem, it seems). In attempting to cast off all constraints, however, I wonder how much good the camp organizers do their charges. It's one thing to help a girl see that Britney Spears demeans herself by flashing a bit of thong to sell albums. It's another to convince this girl that she is belittled by singing in a voice that pleases the ear, or that real empowerment lies with casting off the tight constraints enforced by scales, rhythm, and lyrical subtlety in favor of unconstrained noise-making. Obeying the former leads to the creation of art; succumbing to the latter leads to momentary satiation, which can only be sustained with increasingly bizarre departures from social stricture. The former builds within the girl a repertoire of talent that contributes vastly to her self-esteem, the latter sets her on a path to seek approval by debasing herself in the name of challenging conformity.

But then, I'm only a man, no doubt blinded by the vast male hegemony that at once binds and empowers me. Or something like that. But it seems to me that Etta James, Rosemary Clooney, and Aretha Franklin, to name a few legends, and Sarah McLachlan, Norah Jones, and Jennifer Knapp, to name a few young stars, have all been successful precisely because they have gone against the grain in their musical subfields, providing different voices and music that is suffused not just with some vague attitude (what today one calls "grrl power"), but with independence supported always by superior talent.

So my hypothesis is as follows: there appears to be ample room for real talent to emerge and thrive in the American music scene, even in an age where Cher can be a multi-millionaire. Perhaps the problem is not that women are pressured into voicing sticky sweet lyrics or flashing their cleavage; perhaps the problem is that women with relatively little talent are able to excel in the entertainment industry by doing so, because a vast market of ignorant consumers awaits.

In other words, the women in music who feel most pressured to be the next superstar sexpot are precisely the ones who have a lesser foundation of talent. Women with superior talent have great opportunity, in a world of increasing disposable income, to carve out a profitable niche for their voice, without doing a Britney Spears bump-and-grind.

Which brings me to this ironic conclusion: by trumpeting non-conformity and tribal identity over discipline and ruthless pursuit of an artistic ideal, people like this camp's organizers may, despite their intentions, actually contribute to the very social phenomenon they despise. They heighten the passion of girls to be performers, but they fill them with the delusion that what is needed to succeed is not talent ("you only need three chords;" "anybody can be a rock star"), but attitude. Far better -- if the goal is to foster female musical talent that doesn't fit the sickening mold -- to subject these girls to rigorous training and critique, provided by the best available talent, regardless of vaginal status.

But then again, I'm just a man.

Posted by Woodlief on July 19, 2002 at 11:52 AM


Comments

Tony, Tony, Tony -

Don't you see that you're just blinded by your penis?

[brief pause to let several untoward mental images flash through our minds...]

- Parker

Posted by: Parker at July 19, 2002 1:35 PM

My favorite moment in Fox TV's "American Idol" came early in the audition process. A brunette with incredible flashing eyes sang, dreadfully, and one of the talent scouts said something like, "I don't think you even hit one right note."

Her response (and here I use single quote marks to indicate the level of scorn heaped on the individual words): "I wasn't ''trying'' to '''hit''' the ''''''right'''''' '''notes.'''"

Posted by: Brian Jones at July 19, 2002 2:47 PM

It is unfair that boys are the only ones who get to have talentless punk bands.

The silly-girl feminists have plagued us with this vagino-fascist crap for going on three decades now. Thanks to your post, Dr. Woodlief, I believe that I am now beginning to understand the appeal of homosexuality.

Posted by: Montag at July 19, 2002 6:58 PM

They shouldn't call them music camps anymore, they should just call them fame camps. No one wants to be a good musician nowadays, they just want to be a celebrity. more...

Posted by: Cis at July 20, 2002 12:14 AM

Tony,

I would not have been able to listen to even 30 seconds of that twaddle on NPR, but I enjoyed reading your "take" on it. Of all the fatuous alternative worlds out there for our edification, the academic feminist model must rank at the top of the list.

The consciousness-raising sessions, the bare-breasted, tree-hugging romps in the woods, the creation of modern-day mythological spirit worlds with hags and crones and assorted other new age wise womyn, the theory of intercourse as rape, the theory of masculine pronouns as figurative rape, the pseudointellectual historical revisionism that judges Western history from the perspective of 60s leftism, etc., etc. It would all be laughable were it not so pathetic.

And just to show finally how hopelessly unredeemable I am, I will quote Joseph Conrad:

"It's queer how out of touch with truth women are. They live in a world of their own, and there had never been anything like it, and there never can be. It is too beautiful altogether, and if they were to set it up it would go to pieces before the first sunset. Some confounded fact we men have been living contentedly with ever since the day of creation would start up and knock the whole thing over."

Joe, you are the man!


Posted by: jim at July 20, 2002 6:17 PM

looks like this kind of camp for "grrrrrrls" is not limited to Seattle. My town of ANn Arbor has also been infected by this virus- usually this is a situation where talentless older women, who for obvious reasons, havent made it as musicians, try to organise a "conciousness-raising" type of camp, where impressionable, younger girls are told that they need to develop asocial attitudes, act nasty, turn to lesbianism, to shock and confront their way to fame and fortune.
it would be funny if these camps were reports from The Onion, but it is extremely sad because these camps are sprouting all over the place- where talentless losers, who happen to be women, take their resentments out by indoctrinating impressionable girls into their cult of perpetual victimhood. Since they coundt sing or play a lick, so they are encouraged to strike out against the omnipresent male hegemony. These camps tent to attract girls who are socially inept, non-athletic, or have other problems, and they come back filled with rage against the whole world. And when their lack of talent, or their lack of desire to learn music leads to failure, they sit around, angry, bitching about the men in the world have conspired to put them down!!!
I manage a music store here, and I have to deal with these talentless losers with huge egos and bad attitudes every single day!!!!!

Posted by: Anonymous at July 20, 2002 6:58 PM

Tony,

Your reference, near the end, to tribal identity is to the point. I wonder how much this camp is about rejecting the need to conform to the music industry (By the way, are males free of the need to conform?) and how much is about rejecting music itself because it's structure and methods, its canon, and our established musical tastes, are all largely products of past patriarchy.

Even the instruments we use are suspect. For instance, some may be more easily mastered by a person with large hands. Since more men than women have large hands, a feminist might argue (and probably has argued) that women have been marginalized. (That there are instruments that are more suited to women than men would not serve as compensation. The disgruntled feminist would undoubtedly "discover" that those instruments and the repretoire for them have been given second-class status in the patriarchal world.)

One does not need to be a feminist to see that the development of our civilization (and probably all other civilizations as well) has male domination as one of its dominant features. However, another feature of our civilization has been the slow dissolution of those social structures that had put both men and women in pre-ordained classes and held them there by the power of both secular and religious law. The process is not finished, obviously. However, the legacy we have inherited has so much that is worth cherishing and preserving, so much that is there for us to simply enjoy. To mark everything with the taint of patriarchy and actually believe that it can be purged by retreating into girls-only camps with girls-only rules seems to me both misguided and ridiculous.

Posted by: jim at July 21, 2002 3:42 PM

The underlying problem is the mush-minded notion that systems in which it's possible to be wrong are . . . um, wrong. All rules and standards crush the creativity, spirit and self-esteem of the inner and/or outer child. I don't think this is a feminist idea per se. You'd think singing in tune with others would be a collectivist ideal.

Posted by: Joanne Jacobs at July 22, 2002 3:25 AM

Oh I know what you mean, Joanne. If they think 4 being the only answer to 2 + 2 is oppressive, how can we expect them to see musical rules and standards any different.

The truth is the only creative freedom we have as artists comes from knowing the rules and standards of our chosen medium, and that takes a lot of hardwork and dedication. There are no shortcuts and natural talent only speeds the process up so much.

"Camps" like these pander to the notion that todays youth are incapable of making that kind of commitment, of working hard for a distant goal. It's insulting and, too often, self-fullfilling.

Posted by: Cis at July 22, 2002 10:23 AM

These poor girls would have been better served by a showing of Walt Disney's 1955 movie, Lady and the Tramp. In which, most of the songs were co-written by Peggy Lee, with several sung by her.

You want female creativity? Try, "He's a Tramp (But I Love Him)". In which her famous ability to "bend a note" makes the song.

You want female victimhood? Lee, who died earlier this year, had her mother die when she was 4. Her father, who as a railroad man in Jamestown, ND traveled frequently, re-married a woman who abused young Peggy. To the extent that she had to live with a facial scar from being hit with the buckle end of a belt by wicked step-mom.

When asked about that childhood years later, she replied: "It was good for me. It toughened me."

Here's a list of songs written by Lee that have been performed by other singers (as well as herself) at:

http://www.peggylee.com/solos/others.html

Posted by: Patrick R. Sullivan at July 22, 2002 11:15 AM

I heard that piece while I was cooking dinner (as the man in the family, proving my penis is not blinding my thoughts). The star musician who visited the camp is Carrie Brownstein of "Sleater-Kinney" (whose album, "The Hot Rock", I own, published by "Kill Rock Stars"). She is a dyke, just to provide full disclosure. They are a garage-rock band that takes advantage of their female differences (their voices) to sound distinctive.

When I listened to that piece, I imagined my daughter going to such a camp because she was truly interested in making music. It makes me think of "La Bamba" movie we watched over the weekend, where Ritchie Valens pleads that he only cares about "making my music".

I think you are blowing all out of proportion. If I send my son to basketball camp, is it because he thinks (and I support) that he will make the NBA? No, it is because he loves the sport enough to dedicate a week of his life to improving his skill. Regardless of whether Michael Jordan comes to camp to talk to them, I still expect him lucky to play first string when he gets to college.

I am much more deeply concerned about true winers like Michael Jackson, the most successful King of Pop, who feels that the music industry is giving blacks a raw deal (now, 30 years later).

He may be right (and so may be female musicians), but how do you act on it? How do you work within the system to your benefit? That isn't something these girls are ready to even consider, and I think you are reading too much into what this camp was about!

Posted by: David at July 22, 2002 11:25 AM

David there is big difference between sending your son o a basketball camp and kind of "grrrrrrllll" rock-n-roll camp featured in the NPR story. In basketball, you kid will be taught that one needs to work hard at one's skills if one is to make it in the NBA or in other pursuits in life. In the Grrrrrls rock-nroll camp, learning t he craft of music is not emphasised, leftist, postmodernist, notions of identy-politics in its worst form are trotted out and girls are taught that talent, hard work, dedication are nothing but male prescribed concepts, designed solely to opress women, and keep them out of the music business. So girls are taught that they dont need to learn to be creative and creat great music, but that they should attempt to make it by exhibiting and anti-social, anti-establishment, anti-male attitude, and also that concepts like standards dont exist, because "standards" are nothing but a male-designed method of oppression!!! So, instead of learning the techniques and craft of music making, girls in these camps are encouraged to play the role of perpetual victim, taught that they aren't good enough, that the only way to succeed is to have an"attitude"!!! Thsi is another example of leftist, feminist ideology of victimhood run amuck.

Posted by: Anonymous at July 22, 2002 9:57 PM

And at basketball camp boys are taught that they are Jocks who can rule their world because they are cooler and bigger and predestined to success? There are by-products, to be sure, but these kind of events for kids are to focus them on what they are passionate about.

Really, I think you guys are just reading too much into it. Does every girls-only or women-only event need to be feminist, agenda-toting event?

Posted by: David at July 23, 2002 11:26 AM

Well, yes, these events do have have that agenda, or else well-off, well intentioned liberal types won't send their kids. Social agendas are vital for college applications. Conservative parents know better than to enroll their daughters in indocrination camps and poor people don't have the money or the inclination. Girls only events, unless they're "Princess Parties" on the Upper West Side have to have veneer of sisterhood, low-fat and Kumbayah.

Posted by: Kate at July 26, 2002 7:42 PM

Well, yes, these events do have have that agenda, or else well-off, well intentioned liberal types won't send their kids. Social agendas are vital for college applications. Conservative parents know better than to enroll their daughters in indocrination camps and poor people don't have the money or the inclination. Girls only events, unless they're "Princess Parties" on the Upper West Side have to have veneer of sisterhood, low-fat and Kumbayah.

Posted by: Kate at July 26, 2002 7:42 PM