Quote of the Week:

"As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand." (Joshua Billings)

Drop me a line if you want to be notified of new posts to SiTG:

The Best of Sand:

The Blog
Greatest Hits
Faith and Life
Judo Chops
Critiques of Libertarianism
Snapshots of Life

Creative Commons License
All work on this site and its subdirectories is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Search the Site:

My Writing Online:

On Crossing a Picket Line

Not Non-Fiction
Caroline's Journey
Coming Apart

The Craft:

Banshee Studios
Collected Miscellany
Doorknobs & Bodypaint
Image Journal
Missouri Review

Favorite Journals:

Atlantic Monthly
New Pantagruel

Blogs I Dig:

Education & Edification:

Arts & Letters Daily
Bill of Rights Institute
Junk Science
U.S. Constitution

It's good to be open-minded. It's better to be right:

Stand Athwart History
Weekly Standard
Media Research
WSJ Opinion


Institute for Justice
Local Pregnancy Crisis
Mission Aviation
Prison Ministries
Russian Seminary



last 50 referring URLs

Donors Hall of Fame

Susanna Cornett
Joe Drbohlav
Michael Heaney
Laurence Simon
The Timekeeper
Rob Long
Paul Seyferth

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

July 09, 2002
Uncivil & Wrong

A headline from the Washington Post: "Black Leaders Attack Bush on Civil Rights". It is the usual stuff, the likes of Jesse Jackson and Kweisi Mfume, fathers of illegitimate children both, instructing others on the importance of civic virtue.

"Today," Jackson intoned, referring to George Bush and John Ashcroft, "we face the most threatening combination to civil rights in 50 years." In other words, 1953 held fewer threats to civil rights in America than does 2002. The man who claimed to have cradled Martin Luther King as he lay dying from an assassin's bullet has always struggled with the subject of history, so perhaps a refresher is in order:

* In 1953, Bull Connor was still the Public Safety Commissioner in Birmingham, Alabama.

* In 1953, Medgar Evers had to organize boycotts because gas stations refused to allow blacks to use their restrooms.

* In 1953, the U.S. was still a year from deciding that state-sanctioned school segregation is unconstitutional.

* In 1953, there were five black men destined to be lynched by white mobs before the decade was over.

* In 1953, fewer than five percent of eligible blacks were registered to vote in many Southern counties.

It is a shame that some seek to squander, in a single generation, the moral capital that King built and paid for with his life. It is a nearly equal shame that news media outlets like the Post continue to hail them as "black leaders," as if American blacks were some vast monolithic tribe, and these charlatans their elected spokesmen.

Posted by Woodlief on July 09, 2002 at 11:02 AM



Posted by: susanna on July 9, 2002 11:13 AM

Didn't MLK say something about judging according to the content of their character?

In today's Plain Dealer (Cleveland's abominable newsrag) I read about a store owner who is getting a 3 1/2-year jail sentence for defrauding the food-stamp program to the tune of $15 million. The scam was characterized by one of the prosecutors as a case of the store-owner stealing food from the mouths of children.

This is a mischaracterization. The scammer stole $15 million from the government (which stole the money from the taxpayers). The parents deprived their children of food so that they could purchase cigarettes, liquor, illegal drugs, guns, etc.

How many times has this scenario occurred in the Cleveland area in the last ten years? Three dozen times? Four dozen times? And every single time the script has featured the same players: Arab store-owning thieves and Black child-abusing parents.

The Jesses and Kweisis would characterize my outrage over such incidents as racism. And it would be were I to extrapolate from these incidents (as common as they are) and impute moral slovenliness and criminality to all Arabs and all Blacks.

Still, I must ask, who should I blame for the fact that almost all the Black leaders I see and hear, both locally and nationally, are race-card-playing demagogues? The Blacks who apparently support them? The media that features one type but not the other? It seems I get a steady diet of Jesse, Sharpton, Farrakhan, Cynthia McKinney, Maxine Waters, OJ, Tyson, Tupac, Jacko, Iverson (and I could run this list of leaders, role models, icons, and superstars on and on). What, precisely, am I supposed to respect here?

Posted by: jim on July 10, 2002 10:48 AM

That's one in the X-ring, Tony.
The only significant way blacks are worse off in 2002 is that they are "represented" by the likes of Jackson, Sharpton, and Farrakhan, instead of Martin Luther King.
Now THAT'S a step back.

Posted by: Toren on July 10, 2002 12:55 PM

Hello Everyone,

The truth needs to be told.


I couldn't help but piggy-bag off of the topic to expose other truths.


Michael Lofton

Posted by: Michael Lofton on July 19, 2004 11:32 PM

Hello Everyone,

The truth needs to be told.


I couldn't help but piggy-back off of the topic to expose other truths.


Michael Lofton

Posted by: Michael Lofton on July 19, 2004 11:44 PM

Post a comment

Email Address:



Remember your info?